IK Multimedia TONEX Board Review: Is It Worth $999.99?

IK Multimedia TONEX Board is a floor-based guitar and bass processor built around the company’s TONEX AI Machine Modeling technology. Unlike the smaller TONEX hardware, the Board is designed as a complete hardware rig with two independent signal paths, up to four simultaneous Tone Models, up to 12 effect slots, flexible effects-loop routing, MIDI, multiple outputs, IR loading, and touchscreen control.

The important question is not whether TONEX captures can sound convincing. The more relevant question at this price is whether the Board’s hardware architecture provides enough practical advantages over conventional multi-effects processors to justify the premium. Its value depends less on the number of effects than on the combination of TONEX captures, dual-path routing, external hardware integration and preset recall.

Our verdict: TONEX Board is a serious professional guitar processor, but it is not automatically the best choice at this price. Its strongest advantage is the combination of TONEX captures, dual-path processing, external hardware integration and recallable studio/live routing. If you only need one amp sound and a few effects, cheaper hardware makes more sense.

TONEX Board Architecture: Two Signal Paths and Four Tone Models

The defining feature of TONEX Board is its dual-path architecture. Each of the two signal paths can run one Amp Tone Model and one Stomp Tone Model, allowing up to four Tone Models simultaneously.

The four-model configuration is organized across two independent signal paths, with one Amp Tone Model and one Stomp Tone Model available per path. In other words, the headline “four Tone Models” does not represent four unrestricted amp chains. That distinction matters when comparing TONEX Board with more open-ended processors such as the Quad Cortex.

The two-path design nevertheless covers several practical configurations: dual amps, stereo rigs, wet/dry setups, parallel processing and blended amp tones. Effects can be positioned within the available processing architecture, making the Board considerably more flexible than smaller TONEX hardware.

For recording and reamping, this is the feature that changes the product’s role. Instead of using TONEX simply as an amp replacement, the Board can function as the central processor for a complete guitar or bass signal chain.

The key advantage is therefore not simply “four Tone Models.” It is the ability to build a repeatable signal architecture around those models.

TONEX Board Effects: 76 Effects and Up to 12 Processing Slots

TONEX Board includes 76 effects, combining processors derived from AmpliTube and TONEX with new effects developed for the Board. More important than the headline number is how those processors fit into the two-path architecture.

The Board provides up to 12 effect slots, while up to four Tone Models can run simultaneously. This makes the Board closer to a complete multi-effects processor than the smaller TONEX hardware.

For guitar production, the practical advantage is that the effects chain can remain part of the stored hardware preset. A producer can therefore recall not only an amp capture but the surrounding processing required to reproduce the tone.

The 76-effect specification should not, however, be interpreted as evidence that TONEX Board offers more sophisticated effects than every competing platform. Line 6, Neural DSP and other established processors also provide extensive effects libraries. The Board’s differentiation is the way those effects are combined with the TONEX capture ecosystem.

TONEX Board Routing and I/O: Built for Complex Guitar Rigs

Routing is one of the strongest reasons to choose TONEX Board over the smaller TONEX hardware. The processor provides two independent signal paths, flexible effects-loop placement, two stereo output pairs, MIDI, external control and four-cable-method support.

The balanced XLR outputs and balanced 1/4-inch TRS outputs allow different destinations to be handled independently, including front-of-house, FRFR monitoring, amplifiers and studio equipment. Global EQ for the output pairs is useful when the same preset needs to feed different monitoring systems.

The effects loop can operate as a stereo send/return or as two independent mono loops, and its position can be moved within the signal path. This makes it possible to place external pedals or processors before or after modeled stages.

Four-cable-method support is another practical advantage for players who want to combine TONEX processing with a conventional guitar amplifier. This lets the Board sit inside an existing amp-and-pedal rig rather than forcing the entire setup into the digital domain.

For a studio, the same architecture is useful for reamping and external processing. A DI guitar can be sent through different Tone Models, split into parallel paths, or routed through external hardware without changing the original performance.

TONEX Board Audio Quality: Modeling, Conversion and Real-World Use

TONEX Board’s sound quality comes from two different parts of the system: the TONEX capture engine and the hardware signal path surrounding it.

The TONEX ecosystem uses IK Multimedia’s AI Machine Modeling technology to capture the sonic behavior of real amps, cabinets and pedals. The resulting Tone Models are designed to reproduce the response and playing feel of the captured equipment, making dynamics, guitar volume and picking intensity important parts of the experience.

The Board uses 24-bit/192 kHz converters, with a specified frequency response of 5 Hz–24 kHz and up to 123 dB of dynamic range. These specifications describe the hardware’s conversion capability, but they do not by themselves establish superior audible performance. In practice, the selected Tone Model, cab or IR, gain staging, guitar and monitoring chain will have a much larger effect on the final result.

For professional recording, the more important benefit is repeatability. Once the Tone Model and signal chain are saved, the setup can be recalled without rebuilding the same physical amplifier, microphone placement and pedalboard.

That makes TONEX Board particularly useful for tracking and reamping, where the final guitar tone may need to change after the performance has already been recorded.

TONEX Board USB Audio: Can It Replace an Audio Interface?

TONEX Board should not currently be treated as a complete replacement for a studio audio interface. At launch on September 3, 2026, TONEX Board’s USB-C connection is used for preset and Tone Model transfer and firmware updates. The announced 4-in/2-out USB audio interface with configurable routing and direct monitoring is scheduled to become available on October 1, 2026 via a free firmware update.

Until that update is available, the practical studio configuration is to connect the Board’s analog outputs to a separate audio interface. Once the October 1 firmware update is available, USB audio should make the Board more practical as a direct DAW recording interface. For now, however, it should be treated as a future workflow improvement rather than part of the core launch specification.

How We Evaluate TONEX Board

This review analyzes TONEX Board from a recording and production perspective, focusing on how its published hardware architecture translates into practical guitar and bass workflows.

• Tone Models: considered in terms of the TONEX capture workflow and their role in recording and live production.
• Signal routing: analyzed for dual-amp, stereo, parallel and wet/dry configurations.
• Studio integration: examined for tracking, reamping and external hardware workflows.
• Recall: considered as part of repeatable production and live-rig workflows.
• I/O: analyzed in relation to interfaces, amplifiers, FRFR systems and external processors.
• Value: judged against the published capabilities and current US pricing of competing hardware processors.

Where independent laboratory measurements or hands-on measurements are unavailable, this review does not treat published specifications as evidence of superior audible performance.

TONEX Board Limitations: What the Specifications Do Not Tell You

TONEX Board has an unusually broad specification sheet, but several headline features need context before they can be used to justify the $999.99 price.

• Four Tone Models: these are distributed across two signal paths rather than four unrestricted amp chains.
• 76 effects: the number is broad, but effect count alone does not establish DSP quality or depth.
• USB audio: the announced 4-in/2-out USB functionality depends on a future firmware update.
• Software workflow: some announced software features are still rolling out. ToneNET sharing of Board presets is scheduled for October 1, while full real-time editing in TONEX Board Editor is planned for Q4 2026.
• Footswitch control: four footswitches support Preset, Scene and Stomp modes, but players accustomed to larger floor processors may want more dedicated switches for direct access to individual functions.
• Price: at $999.99, the Board competes with significantly cheaper processors and therefore needs to deliver value through its specific routing and TONEX ecosystem.

These limitations do not make TONEX Board a weak product. They define its target user. The Board makes the most sense when its routing, external hardware integration and recall capabilities are actually required.

TONEX Board vs. HX Stomp, Ampero, Kemper, and Neural DSP

TONEX Board vs HX Stomp

HX Stomp is one of the strongest alternatives because it delivers a mature modeling and effects platform at a substantially lower price. TONEX Board is the better fit when captured amps and pedals, the TONEX library and its dual-path architecture are more important than the broader Helix ecosystem.

TONEX Board vs Neural DSP Nano Cortex

Nano Cortex is the more compact and less expensive option for players who mainly want capture-based amp processing. TONEX Board differentiates itself through more extensive routing, effects, I/O and external hardware integration.

TONEX Board vs Quad Cortex

Quad Cortex remains the more ambitious high-end platform, particularly for users who prioritize extensive routing and a premium hardware interface. TONEX Board’s argument is that it brings a substantial dual-path capture-based system into a lower-priced category than flagship processors such as the Quad Cortex.

Where TONEX Board Earns Its Place in a Professional Workflow

TONEX Board makes the most sense in productions where guitar or bass tones have to be built quickly, recalled accurately, and changed after the performance has already been recorded. In that environment, it can occupy several roles: tracking front end, reamping processor, external hardware insert, rehearsal rig, or live performance system.

The studio advantage is repeatability. Instead of recalling an amp, microphone position, pedalboard, cabinet, and outboard chain separately, the engineer can store the core guitar signal path as a hardware preset. That does not make every decision recallable in isolation—microphone placement and the behavior of a physical amplifier still have advantages in some recording situations—but it makes a modeled rig substantially easier to reproduce across sessions.

Reamping is an even stronger use case. A DI performance can remain untouched while the Board supplies different amp captures, parallel configurations, effects chains, or external hardware routing. This is useful when the production reaches the mix stage and the original guitar tone no longer fits the arrangement. The engineer can change the source without asking the player to recreate the performance.

For touring, the argument is consolidation. The Board can accommodate dual-amp stereo rigs, wet/dry routing, external effects, MIDI devices, expression control and separate output paths in a single hardware platform, potentially reducing the need for multiple processors in complex setups. At 1.6 kg and 235 × 184 × 72 mm, it is also substantially easier to transport than a conventional multi-amp setup, although the total weight and size of a complete touring system will still depend on the external pedals, power supplies, and monitoring hardware involved.

Mixing engineers can use the Board in a similar way as an external guitar-processing path. It is particularly useful when a track contains a clean or lightly processed DI and the final amp sound has not yet been committed. The Board can provide another hardware signal path without forcing the engineer to alter the existing plugin chain or reserve substantial CPU resources for additional nonlinear processing.

Is TONEX Board Worth $999.99?

TONEX Board is worth $999.99 if you need its routing architecture. It is not worth $999.99 if you only need amp modeling.

The price makes sense for guitarists, producers and engineers who need several of the following at the same time:

• Multiple Tone Models in one preset
• Dual-amp or parallel processing
• Wet/dry routing
• External pedals and processors
• Four-cable-method integration
• Multiple balanced outputs
• MIDI control
• Recallable studio and live rigs
• Hardware-based reamping

If you need only one convincing amp sound, a few effects and a compact recording rig, the cheaper TONEX hardware, HX Stomp, Nano Cortex or similar processors can provide a better cost-to-capability ratio.

Who Should Buy TONEX Board?

Buy TONEX Board if:

• You already use TONEX and want a more complete hardware rig.
• You regularly record or reamp guitar and bass.
• You need two amp paths, stereo or parallel processing.
• You use external pedals or studio hardware.
• You need separate outputs for FOH, monitors, amplifiers or studio equipment.
• You need MIDI and recallable presets for a complex live rig.
• You want one processor that can move between studio and stage.

Do not buy TONEX Board if:

• You only need one amp model at a time.
• You rarely use guitar or bass in your productions.
• You do not need external hardware routing.
• You primarily want the smallest possible capture-based processor.
• You are buying it mainly because of the 24-bit/192 kHz specification.

TONEX Board Pros and Cons

Pros

• Convincing TONEX amp and pedal capture ecosystem.
• Two independent signal paths.
• Up to four Tone Models in a preset.
• Flexible stereo, parallel, dual-amp and wet/dry routing.
• 12 processing slots.
• 76 available effects.
• Movable stereo or dual-mono effects loop.
• Four-cable-method support.
• Balanced XLR and TRS output pairs.
• MIDI and external-control integration.
• Touchscreen and hardware controls.
• Strong fit for studio, reamping and live workflows.

Cons

• $999.99 is expensive for users who only need amp modeling.
• Four physical footswitches provide less dedicated live access than larger floor processors with more switches.
• The four-Tone-Model specification does not mean four unrestricted amp chains.
• USB audio depends on the announced firmware implementation.
• Some future software features should not be treated as launch-day capabilities.

Overall Rating

The 8.5/10 score reflects the strength of the complete system and its published architecture, while the 7.5/10 value score reflects the fact that many users will not need its full routing and integration capabilities.

The TONEX Board is therefore a strong professional processor whose biggest weakness is not sound quality but cost relative to how much of its architecture the user will actually exploit. Its routing and integration capabilities are genuinely useful in complex guitar and bass workflows, while the value proposition becomes much weaker for simple rigs. For a recording or mixing engineer, the Board earns its 8.5/10 primarily through workflow consolidation, repeatability, and signal-path flexibility rather than through specifications alone.

TONEX Board Review Verdict

TONEX Board is worth $999.99 when its routing architecture is part of the requirement—not when it is being used as a simple amp modeler.

TONEX Board’s strongest argument is the combination of four simultaneous Tone Models, two independent signal paths, 12 effect slots, flexible external routing, multiple outputs, MIDI and recallable presets. That makes it substantially more relevant to complex studio and live rigs than to players who simply need one convincing amp sound.

The price is harder to justify for simpler setups. At $999.99, TONEX Board costs $400 more than the $599.99 HX Stomp and $450.99 more than the $549 Nano Cortex. That price premium needs to be justified by its routing, I/O, external hardware integration and TONEX ecosystem rather than by amp modeling alone.

FAQ: TONEX Board for Recording, Mixing, and Live Production

Can you record guitar directly into a DAW with TONEX Board?
Not through USB at launch. IK has announced 4-in/2-out USB audio with direct monitoring as a future firmware feature. Until that update is available, recording requires routing the Board’s analog outputs into a separate audio interface.

Does TONEX Board add latency when used for recording?
Like any digital amp-modeling processor, TONEX Board introduces processing latency, but the manufacturer does not publish a complete independent round-trip latency measurement for a full recording setup. Actual monitoring latency will depend on the Board, audio interface, DAW buffer size and monitoring path. IK describes TONEX Board as an ultra-low-latency processor, but that claim should not be confused with a measured end-to-end studio latency figure.

Can TONEX Board be used for reamping a DI guitar track?
Yes. A recorded DI can be sent through the Board and processed with different Tone Models, effects, and routing configurations without recording the performance again. This makes it useful when the guitar tone was not fully committed during tracking.

Can TONEX Board run two different amps at the same time?
Yes. Its two signal paths can be configured with separate Amp Tone Models and combined using stereo, parallel, split, or other supported routing configurations. The four-Tone-Model limit should not be interpreted as four completely independent amp chains.

Can TONEX Board be used with a tube amp and external pedals?
Yes. The effects loop can operate in stereo or as two mono loops, and the Board supports the four-cable method. This allows it to sit between parts of a conventional amplifier rig rather than forcing every stage of the setup into the digital domain.

Does TONEX Board replace an audio interface?
Not at launch. TONEX Board’s announced 4-in/2-out USB audio interface with configurable routing and direct monitoring is scheduled for October 1, 2026 via a free firmware update. Even after that update, it should be viewed as a specialized guitar and bass recording interface rather than a general-purpose studio interface with multiple microphone inputs and broader recording I/O.

Is TONEX Board useful if I already own TONEX plugins?
It can be, but the value comes from hardware workflow rather than simply getting the same models in another format. The Board becomes more compelling when you need to take Tone Models outside the DAW, integrate external hardware, build complex routing, or maintain the same rig across studio and live environments.

Does TONEX Board use DAW CPU when processing guitar?
The Board performs its Tone Model and effect processing internally when used as hardware, so those operations do not consume DAW CPU in the same way as native TONEX or other amp-modeling plugins. Computer resources still matter when using the accompanying software for model management, capture, and editing.

Is TONEX Board a good choice for a home recording studio?
It is a strong fit when guitar or bass is a major part of the studio’s work and the user will exploit its routing and recall capabilities. For occasional guitar recording, a smaller TONEX device or software-based rig will usually provide a better cost-to-function ratio.

Should I buy TONEX Board instead of HX Stomp?
Choose TONEX Board when captured amps and pedals, dual-path routing, and the TONEX ecosystem are central to the workflow. HX Stomp is the more economical choice for users who prioritize the broader Helix processing environment and do not specifically need TONEX’s capture ecosystem.

Is TONEX Board a worthwhile upgrade from an existing TONEX Pedal?
Only if the limitations of the smaller hardware are affecting the workflow. The upgrade is primarily about routing, I/O, simultaneous Tone Models, external hardware integration, control, and preset architecture—not a fundamentally new generation of TONEX amp modeling.

Minneapolis and the wider Twin Cities area have a deep music culture built around live performance, independent production, and home recording. From legendary rooms connected to First Avenue and 7th St Entry to countless rehearsal spaces and project studios in Northeast Minneapolis, artists here are constantly creating new material. Many tracks are recorded quickly between shows, rehearsals, or late-night sessions at home, with the expectation that mixing will happen later — often online.

That workflow is now the norm, but it creates a recurring problem. Tracks lose time, budget, and momentum during mixing not because of musical issues, but because files are poorly prepared. Online mixing depends entirely on how stems are delivered. This guide explains how Minneapolis artists can prepare files correctly so online mixing starts immediately, revisions stay focused, and the final sound is release-ready without unnecessary delays.

This guide will help Minneapolis artists deliver stems that mix faster — and sound better.

What “Stems” Really Mean in Online Mixing (And Why It Matters)

In online mixing, the word “stems” is often used loosely, but engineers usually expect something very specific. Multitracks are individual audio files for every recorded element, while stems are grouped bounces such as drums, music, or vocals. Consolidated files mean that every export starts at the same point in the timeline, even if the sound enters later.

Online engineers rely on structure because they do not have access to your original session. When files are prepared consistently, the session opens cleanly, the balance is clear, and creative decisions happen immediately. When files are inconsistent, time is lost rebuilding the song instead of mixing it. Proper stem preparation shortens turnaround, reduces revisions, and often lowers the total cost of the project because the engineer can focus on sound rather than technical cleanup.

Common Recording Scenarios in Minneapolis (And How They Affect Export)

Minneapolis artists record in very different environments, and each one affects how stems should be exported.

Live-to-track sessions are common for bands connected to rehearsal rooms or venues around First Avenue. These sessions often include bleed between microphones and room ambience that defines the sound. In this case, cutting tails aggressively or collapsing tracks into overly processed stems can damage phase relationships and energy. Room microphones should be exported separately, and natural decay should be preserved so the mix retains its live feel.

Home studios in Northeast Minneapolis are another typical setup. Many artists work in untreated rooms with compact interfaces or USB microphones. The most frequent issues here are clipping, background noise, and heavy processing on the master bus. When exporting stems from a home studio, it is critical to remove loudness processing and leave headroom so the mix can breathe.

Vocal-over-two-track beats remain one of the most common workflows. In this scenario, vocals need to be delivered with clarity and separation. Dry vocals, doubles, and ad-libs should be exported as separate files so the engineer can control placement, depth, and energy without fighting baked-in effects.

How to Export Stems for Online Mixing

For online mixing to work smoothly, every file must line up perfectly. All exports should be consolidated so they start from the very beginning of the session, even if silence fills the first bars. This allows the engineer to drop files into a new project and press play without manual alignment.

Sample rate and bit depth should remain exactly as recorded. There is no benefit in changing them during export, and unnecessary conversion can degrade quality. Leaving sufficient headroom is critical. Tracks should never clip, and keeping peaks comfortably below zero ensures the mix engineer has room to shape dynamics.

Clear naming is not cosmetic. When files are labeled logically, the session builds faster and mistakes are avoided. Lossless formats such as WAV or AIFF are essential. Compressed formats remove information that mixing decisions rely on and should never be used for stems.

What Not to Do Before Exporting

Many of the most expensive revision delays come from well-intentioned mistakes made before export. Master bus limiters and maximizers should always be removed. Over-processing tracks “just in case” often limits what the mix engineer can do later. Heavy noise reduction can damage transients and make vocals harder to place naturally. Reverb tails should not be cut short, as they define space and groove.

Most revision back-and-forth happens because these issues are discovered after the session is already underway.

How Proper Stem Preparation Saves Time and Money

Clean stems lead directly to a faster first mix. When files arrive organized and consistent, the engineer does not need to charge for technical fixes or session reconstruction. Communication becomes clearer, revisions stay musical, and the final sound improves faster. Many engineers work more efficiently — and sometimes more affordably — when stems are prepared correctly from the start.

If you are planning online mixing or mastering, proper export is one of the simplest ways to control both cost and turnaround.

Stems vs Multitracks: What Should Minneapolis Artists Send?

In simpler productions, grouped stems can be enough. In live band recordings or complex arrangements, multitracks give the engineer the control needed to manage phase, balance, and dynamics properly. When in doubt, sending consolidated multitracks along with a rough mix is usually the safest option. A quick message to the engineer before export can prevent the need to redo files later.

How to Package and Send Files for Remote Sessions

Once exported, files should be archived into a single folder and delivered via a reliable cloud service. Along with the audio, include a rough mix that represents the intended direction, reference tracks that help define tone and energy, and a short note explaining the goal of the release. This context allows the engineer to make decisions faster and with fewer revisions.

— See also: Which DAW Is the Best in 2026? Real User Data, Not Marketing —

How Prepared Stems Improve Online Mixing Results

Prepared stems lead to clearer vocals, tighter low-end control, and fewer compromises during processing. Because the engineer is not fighting technical issues, more attention can be given to translation, impact, and detail. The result is a mix that feels more “industry-ready” and competitive on streaming platforms.

How AREFYEV Studio Works with Prepared Stems

AREFYEV Studio works remotely with artists from Minneapolis and across the Twin Cities. When stems are prepared correctly, the workflow becomes predictable: clear communication, focused revisions, and reliable turnaround. Proper preparation allows the creative process to stay efficient and stress-free.

If you want your Minneapolis track mixed fast and clean, start with proper stem preparation.

Conclusion: Prepare Once — Mix Faster

For Minneapolis artists balancing live shows, home recording, and independent releases, stem preparation is not just a technical step. It is part of the creative process. Preparing files correctly once saves time, reduces costs, and leads to better mixes.

Send your prepared stems to AREFYEV Studio and get professional online mixing and mastering for your Minneapolis release.

Mini-FAQ

What are stems in music production?
– Stems are grouped audio exports such as drums, music, or vocals, used to simplify mixing workflows.

Do I need to export stems or multitracks?
– Multitracks are usually preferred for complex or live recordings, while stems can work for simpler projects.

How much headroom should stems have?
– Enough to avoid clipping and allow dynamic control during mixing.

Can I send stems from a home studio?
– Yes. Proper preparation matters more than the recording location.

How do stems affect mixing cost?
– Clean, organized stems reduce technical work and often lower the total cost.

How long does online mixing take with prepared files?
– Prepared files typically lead to faster first mixes and fewer revision rounds.

ReFX, whose product is known to every advanced composer, has announced that the Nexus 3 will be released on November 29, 2019. There is not much information, but now we can say that the upgrade from Nexus v2 to v3 will be free for all customers who have purchased a Nexus2 license from the beginning of August 2019. 49 € for customers who purchased Nexus2 from May 1, 2019; 99 € for customers who purchased Nexus2 before May 1, 2019.

— See also: What is resampling? —

Developers promise full compatibility with the first and second version. All settings and presets will continue to work. A completely new, flat, scalable vector interface is expected. Faster work on all devices, as well as support for VST2, VST3, AU and AAX. This version will work only on 64-bit computer systems.

You can read more on the website ReFX.

Steven Slate Drums has announced the release of SSD5 FREE, a free version of its flagship drums software with SSD5 plugin formats VST, AU and AAX for compatible DAW applications.

Although SSD5 FREE is indeed a lightweight version of SSD5, it is a fully functional virtual tool. The main limitation compared to the full version of the software is the fact that SSD5 FREE comes with only one set of acoustic drums. However, it does not limit the end user in any other way, unlike most other competitors’ freely distributed products. It also does not require an iLok account, which is required to activate the full version of SSD5.

In terms of functionality, the free version is almost identical to the commercial one. It is equipped with the same mixer and drum settings, ADSR for each channel, a decent selection of pre-recorded drum grooves in four different styles (Jazz, Pop, RnB, Rock), fully customizable MIDI with a useful selection of presets, and a number of other performance adjustments for fine tuning. The user interface is intuitive and easy to get used to, partly due to the fact that SSD5 does not try to go beyond the available functions.

— See also: 10 best reverb plugins in the world! —

To download a free copy of the tool, go to the product page below and scroll down to the SD5 FREE section. Click the “Try SSD5 Free Now” button and enter your credentials when prompted. Follow the instructions on this page to complete the installation process. After installation, the software does not need to be activated, and your computer does not require third-party software to use it. Keep in mind that only 64-bit digital DAW stations are supported.

Download for free on the Steven Slate Drums website.

It seemed that the development of modules had stopped, but it wasn’t there! The Slate Digital team has just announced a free update to Virtual Mix Rack 2.0.

Virtual Mix Rack 2.0 adds a number of settings to the already very popular sound processing system. The main feature is what is called “Dream Strips,” a quick and easy way to populate your VMR from the moment it opens.

Dream Strips are 8 fully customizable configurations that appear as buttons placed just above the VMR rack. The leftmost is the default value, it will load automatically when using the plug-in in your DAW program. Using drag and drop, the order of the keys and settings can be changed and adjusted to your taste. You will also be available 7 factory kits offered by the developers.

— See also: What is LUFS, and why is it important? —

In addition, a new Clear button has been added to instantly clear all modules. The Undo and Redo buttons are located next to the Slate logo, so if you make a mistake or something goes wrong, you can roll back to previous changes. Changes were also added directly to the modules themselves, some of them (for example Vintage EQ) received a more vintage sound (with minimal noise).

The last big feature is the new Over Sampling option. This is especially useful if you work at low sample rates. However, there is a downside – Over Sampling increases the delay and load on the computer, so use it only when it is absolutely necessary. The best part about this update is that it is available for free to all existing users of Slate Digital plugins.

DAW Sonar gave a second life, thanks to BandLab. The updated version includes all the premium features of SONAR Platinum, such as the award-winning Skylight user interface, flexible ProChannel modules and a powerful 64-bit mixing engine.

“We are pleased to continue developing SONAR in our new reincarnation called Cakewalk by BandLab. Ahead is aggressive development and expansion of its capabilities. We make the software completely free to ensure that any musician, regardless of his financial capabilities, technology or career stage, could get access to high-quality professional instruments for the production of music. It will be useful for both beginners and those who earn a living with their work, “said BandLa CEO b Technologies Meng Ru Quoc

— See also: What is autotune vocals? —

It is worth noting that some third-party products of the extended version are no longer included (they will have to be purchased and installed separately). But this is not a minus. You get a free full-fledged host for working with sound. A new installation of Cakewalk by BandLab through BandLab Assistant will not affect previous SONAR installations. The program is not limited in functionality, but rather integrates conveniently and interacts with previously used plug-ins.

There is no public announcement of the Mac version yet, but Windows users can download SONAR for free on the official website BandLab.

Glitch is a modern plugin from Illformed, available for all operating systems. It highlights better features than ever released. Use beautiful transformations for each note with delicate or hard repetitions.

Features of Glitch by Illformed:

• 128 tracks with MIDI notes
• Each strip has its own parameters.
• Setting the time and pace of the project

The sequencer allows you to play many effects in real time to create interesting layers. Improved synchronization management and effect modules designed for slicing, gluing and other basic functions.

— See also: 10 best vocal tuning plugins worth a try —

Effects synchronized with tempo can be easily changed and edited with filters, mixing and panning tools. The Randomize and Mutate functions can be found at almost every level.

Ample Sound released Ample Percussion Cloudrum – a free virtual percussion instrument in VST, AU and AAX formats and as a standalone standalone application.

Ample Percussion Cloudrum is a drum instrument with four presets (Open, Mute, Open Release, Muted Release) and two microphone positions with stereo and mono modes for each of them. It covers a range of three octaves.

The user interface looks clean and modern. The user can adjust the microphone sound and surroundings. Cloudrum has a built-in pre-installed manager and a doubling mode that plays various samples in the left and right channels for a wide stereo effect.

You can download it for free by direct link from the developer’s site, without registration (distribution is closed). It can work as a plugin for your DAW program, or as a standalone application.